1. Direct Method:
The implication p→q can be proved by showing
that if p is true then q must also be true.
Eg: “If n is odd
then
is odd”
Proof:
Assume that n is odd. Then n=2K+1 for
some integer K. Then,
=
=
+4K+1= (2(
+2K)+1)= 2M+1 where M is an integer, Which is similar to (2K+1). Hence
is odd and proves the theorem, “If n is odd then
is odd”.
2. Indirect Method:
To prove a theorem by indirect method, assume the conclusion is false
and using true facts show the hypothesis is false. i.e. showing, ¬q→¬p , we can prove p→q.
Eg: “If 3n+2 is odd then n is odd”.
Proof:
Assuming n is even, n=2K, then,
3n+2= 3(2K)+2 =6K+2 =2(3K+1) =2M, where M is an integer,
Thus, 3n+2 is even which proves that, ” If 3n+2 is odd then n is odd” by
indirect method.
3. Contradiction
Method:
To prove the
implication of the form p→q, assume p ˄ ¬q is true. Then try to show that the
assumption is false then its negation is true which leads to ¬p∨q to be true which is logically equivalent to p→q. Hence p→q is true.
Eg: “If
is even then a is an even number”
Proof: Let us
suppose,
p:
is even number.
q: a is an even number.
Let us assume p ˄ ¬q is true
i.e.
is even and a is odd. Then,
a= 2K+1 so,
=
=2(
+2K)+1 =2M+1 which is always odd, hence
is odd, which contradicts our assumption. Hence, “If
is even then a is an even
number”.
4.
By Cases:
To prove the
implication of the form (
…
) →q. The tautology [(
…
) →q ↔ (
→q) ˄ (
→q) ˄ ……˄(
→q)] as a value of inference. This shows that the original hypothesis
made with disjunction of proposition
…,
can be proved by showing each
implication (
→q).
-Show that the proposition p∨(q ˄ r) and (r∨q) ˄ (p∨r) are logically
equivalent.
We can show p∨(q ˄ r) and (r∨q) ˄ (p∨r) are logically equivalent by
showing
p∨(q ˄ r)↔(p∨q) ˄ (p∨r) is a tautology.
p
|
q
|
r
|
q ˄ r
|
p∨q
|
p∨r
|
p∨(q ˄ r)
|
(p∨q) ˄ (p∨r)
|
p∨(q ˄ r)↔(p∨q) ˄ (p∨r)
|
F
|
F
|
F
|
F
|
F
|
F
|
F
|
F
|
T
|
F
|
F
|
T
|
F
|
F
|
T
|
F
|
F
|
T
|
F
|
T
|
F
|
F
|
T
|
F
|
F
|
F
|
T
|
F
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
F
|
F
|
F
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
F
|
T
|
F
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
F
|
F
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
T
|
No comments:
Post a Comment